Literary Metaphor Comprehension in the Rational and Experiential Cognitive Styles of Human Thinking

Authors

  • Jana Kuzmíková Department of the History of Slovak Literature, Institute of Slovak Literature, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3733-3899
  • Ján Kuzmík Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.16.2.16

Keywords:

Literary metaphor; Interpretation of metaphor; Rational (analytical) cognitive style; Experiential (intuitive) cognitive style; Emergent metaphorical meaning

Abstract

Prior research on the poetic metaphor interpretation has focused on describing metaphoric structure and identifying its principles by observing semantically mapped properties of a metaphor. Cognitive literary studies have highlighted an experimental approach to the metaphoric thinking. The experimental approach examines, among others, the empirical processes of metaphor interpretation and comprehension. For metaphor processing, emergent meanings are crucial. We already have many reports, findings and normative data on metaphor processing, but individual cognitive mechanisms and variations across people have received an insufficient attention. To address this issue, this empirical study examines the influence of rational (analytical) and experiential (intuitive) cognitive styles on the comprehension of a poetic literary metaphor. In our statistical analysis, we have used a fractional pooling of the participants. It highlights the non-identical metaphor processes in rational and experiential cognitive preferences. According to our findings, people with a preference for the experiential cognitive style produce relatively more emergent metaphorical meanings than people with a preference for the rational cognitive style. These findings contribute to the more complex knowledge of the metaphoric thinking consequences.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Kuzmíková, J., & Kuzmík, J. (2024). Literary Metaphor Comprehension in the Rational and Experiential Cognitive Styles of Human Thinking. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages & Literatures, 16(2), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.16.2.16

Issue

Section

Articles